description::
"Turkic languages are a language family spoken by Turkic peoples across a vast area stretching from Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean to Siberia and Western China. They are characterized by several linguistic features, such as vowel harmony, agglutination, and a lack of gender. Here's an overview of the Turkic languages:
### Major Branches of Turkic Languages:
1. **Oghuz Branch:**
- **Turkish:** Spoken in Turkey and Cyprus.
- **Azerbaijani:** Spoken in Azerbaijan and parts of Iran.
- **Turkmen:** Spoken in Turkmenistan and parts of Iran and Afghanistan.
2. **Kipchak Branch:**
- **Kazakh:** Spoken in Kazakhstan and parts of China, Mongolia, and Russia.
- **Kyrgyz:** Spoken in Kyrgyzstan and parts of China.
- **Tatar:** Spoken in Russia, particularly in Tatarstan.
- **Bashkir:** Spoken in Russia, particularly in Bashkortostan.
3. **Karluk Branch:**
- **Uzbek:** Spoken in Uzbekistan and parts of Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan.
- **Uyghur:** Spoken in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China.
4. **Siberian Branch:**
- **Yakut:** Spoken in the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) of Russia.
- **Tuvan:** Spoken in Tuva Republic of Russia.
5. **Chuvash:**
- **Chuvash:** Spoken in the Chuvash Republic of Russia. It is the most divergent of the Turkic languages and forms its own branch.
6. **Arghu:**
- This is a lesser-known branch with languages like Khalaj, spoken in parts of Iran.
### Common Characteristics:
- **Vowel Harmony:** Vowels within a word harmonize to be either front or back vowels.
- **Agglutination:** Use of suffixes to express grammatical relations and meanings.
- **Lack of Grammatical Gender:** Turkic languages typically do not have grammatical gender distinctions.
- **SOV Order:** Subject-Object-Verb word order is common.
### Cultural and Historical Context:
- The Turkic languages have a rich history that dates back to ancient times. They were influenced by various empires and migrations, including the Mongol Empire and the spread of Islam.
- Many Turkic languages have borrowed heavily from Arabic and Persian due to historical Islamic influence.
- The modern Turkic-speaking populations are spread across many countries, reflecting a complex history of migration, conquest, and cultural exchange.
### Writing Systems:
- The writing systems for Turkic languages vary widely. Historically, many were written in scripts such as Arabic, Cyrillic, or Latin.
- Turkish, for instance, switched from Arabic to Latin script in the 1920s.
- Other languages like Kazakh and Uzbek are in the process of transitioning from Cyrillic to Latin script.
Understanding Turkic languages involves appreciating their linguistic features, historical development, and the diverse regions in which they are spoken."
[{2024-06-22 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/f9961365-15c1-4eda-8350-6dd1c3ffec77]
===
· the-evolutionary-tree of Tur0Lago:
* Turkic
* Common Turkic
* Oghuz
* Western Oghuz
* Turkish
=== Early forms:
* Old Anatolian Turkish
* Ottoman Turkish
=== Standard forms:
* Istanbul Turkish
=== Dialects:
* Cypriot Turkish
* Iraqi Turkmen
* Karamanli Turkish
* Meskhetian Turkish
* Rumelian Turkish
* Syrian Turkish
name::
* McsEngl.McsLag000041.last.html//dirLag//dirMcs!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.dirMcs/dirLag/McsLag000041.last.html!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.ProtoLago;TurkicLF,
* McsEngl.Tur0!⇒Tur0Lago!=Turkic-LanguageFamily,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago!=McsLag000041,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago!=Turkic-LanguageFamily,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago;TurkLago,
* McsEngl.TurkLago'family-tree,
* McsEngl.Turkic-LanguageFamily!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Turkic-language-family!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Turkic-languages!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.TurkicLF!⇒Tur0Lago!=Turkic-LanguageFamily,
* McsEngl.lago4.Tur0!=TurkicLF!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.lago4.TurkicLF!=Tur0!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.lagoHmnm.0026-TurkicLF!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.lagoHmnm.TurkicLF!⇒Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.lagoTur0!⇒Tur0Lago,
description::
× generic: HmnmMindView,
· the-more clear our mind-views are, the-more concise our language is, especially its name-system.
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0MindView!=mind-view--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0View.mind,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'01-input1,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'input1,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'mind-view,
description::
× generic: HmnmSensoMindView,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0SensoMindView!=senso-mind-view--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0View.senso-mind,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'02-input2,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'input2,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'senso-mind-view,
description::
× generic: HmnmSemoView,
× logo-relation: LogoView,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'03-input3!⇒Tur0SemoView,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'input3!⇒Tur0SemoView,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'semo-view!⇒Tur0SemoView,
* McsEngl.Tur0SemoView!=semo-view--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0View.semo!⇒Tur0SemoView,
description::
× generic: HmnmSemoSntx,
× logo-relation: Tur0Sntx,
description::
× generic: HmnmLagoCnpt,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0LagoCnpt!=lago-concept--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'lago-concept!⇒Tur0LagoCnpt,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago-lago-concept!⇒Tur0LagoCnpt,
* McsEngl.lago-concept--of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0LagoCnpt,
description::
× generic: LagoCnptAtt,
description::
× generic: LagoCnptMember,
description::
* ArgoCnpt-of-Tur0Lago,
* VerbCnpt-of-Tur0Lago,
* ConjCnpt-of-Tur0Lago,
description::
× generic: ArgoCnpt,
× logo-relation: Tur0Argo,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0ArgoCnpt!=ArgoCnpt-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0LagoCnpt.argo!⇒Tur0ArgoCnpt,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'ArgoCnpt!⇒Tur0ArgoCnpt,
description::
× generic: attribute-of-ArgoCnpt,
description::
× generic: reference-ArgoCnpt,
× logo-relation: pronoun,
description::
× generic: HmnmVerbCnpt,
× logo-relation: Tur0Verb,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0LagoCnpt.verb,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'VerbCnpt,
* McsEngl.Tur0VerbCnpt!=verb-concept--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.verb-concept--of-Tur0Lago,
description::
× generic: HmnmConjCnpt,
× logo-relation: Tur0Conj,
· denotes a-sequenced-relation timelessly.
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0LagoCnpt.conjunction!⇒Tur0ConjCnpt,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'ConjCnpt!⇒Tur0ConjCnpt,
* McsEngl.Tur0ConjCnpt!=conjunction-concept--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.conjunction-concept--of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0ConjCnpt,
description::
× generic: HmnmLogoView,
× semo-relation: Tur0SemoView,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'04-output!⇒Tur0LogoView,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'logo-view!⇒Tur0LogoView,
* McsEngl.Tur0LogoView!=logo-view--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0View.logo!⇒Tur0LogoView,
* McsEngl.logoTur0!⇒Tur0LogoView,
description::
× generic: HmnmSntxTree,
× semo-relation: SemoSntxTree,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'syntax-tree,
* McsEngl.Tur0LogoView'syntax-tree,
description::
× generic: HmnmNode,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'node,
* McsEngl.Tur0LogoView'node,
* McsEngl.Tur0Node,
description::
× generic: HmnmUnit,
· logo-unit of Tur0Lago is any indivisible part of output.
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'unit!⇒Tur0Unit,
* McsEngl.Tur0Unit!=unit-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.logo-unit--of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0Unit,
* McsEngl.unitTur0!⇒Tur0Unit,
specific::
* phoneme,
* letter,
description::
× generic: phoneme,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'phoneme!⇒Tur0Phnm,
* McsEngl.Tur0Phnm!=Tur0Lago-phoneme,
* McsEngl.Tur0Unit.phoneme!⇒Tur0Phnm,
* McsEngl.phnmTur0!⇒Tur0Phnm,
* McsEngl.phoneme-of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0Phnm,
description::
* vowel-phoneme,
* vowelNo-phoneme-(consonant),
description::
× generic: vowel-phoneme,
"Turkic languages are famous for their rich vowel systems and systematic vowel-harmony. While individual languages differ slightly, most modern Turkic languages inherited an eight-vowel inventory from Proto-Turkic:
| Feature | Front | Back |
| Unrounded high | **i** /i/ | **ı** /ɯ/ |
| Rounded high | **ü** /y/ | **u** /u/ |
| Unrounded low | **e** /e/ | **a** /a/ |
| Rounded mid | **ö** /ø/ | **o** /o/ |
---
### Proto-Turkic
Reconstructed vowels (≈ 8):
`*i, *ï, *ü, *u, *e, *ä, *ö, *o`
(“\*ä” corresponds to low front /a/ in many modern varieties.)
---
### Examples in Key Modern Turkic Languages
| Language | Inventory |
| **Turkish** | /i, e, ɯ, a, y, ø, u, o/ |
| **Azerbaijani** | /i, e, ə, a, y, ø, u, o, ɯ/ (Latin: i, e, ə, a, ü, ö, u, o, ı) |
| **Kazakh** | /i, ɪ, e, æ, ɯ, u, o, ø, y/ (often transcribed ä for /æ/) |
| **Kyrgyz** | /i, ɪ, e, æ, ɯ, u, o, œ, y/ (very similar to Kazakh, with minor dialectal tweaks) |
| **Uzbek** | /i, e, a, o, u/ (has merged the two front-rounded vowels into /e/ or /i/, yielding a six-vowel system) |
| **Uyghur** | /i, e, ɑ, o, u, œ, y/ (front vs. back and rounded vs. unrounded distinctions largely intact) |
| **Turkmen** | /i, e, a, o, u, ä, ö, ü/ (retains eight-vowel harmony very close to the Proto-Turkic pattern) |
---
### Vowel Harmony
Most Turkic languages enforce **two-dimensional** harmony:
1. **Back vs. Front**
– vowels in a word are all from the back set {a, ı, o, u} or all from the front set {e, i, ö, ü}
2. **Roundedness** (in languages with mid-vowel rounding distinctions)
– high vowels also harmonize for rounded vs. unrounded within their height class
E.g., in Turkish **“kapı”** \[kaˈpɯ] “door” (back + unrounded), but **“gülüm”** \[gyˈlym] “my rose” (front + rounded).
---
### Notes on Variation
* **Azerbaijani** adds a low central vowel /ə/ (schwa).
* **Uzbek** lost front-rounded /ü, ö/, merging them into front-unrounded vowels.
* **Kazakh** and **Kyrgyz** often show additional allophones and a marginal ninth vowel \[ɪ] (near-close front unrounded).
* **Uyghur** orthography (Uyghur Arabic) represents vowels slightly differently but phonology remains close to the eight-vowel pattern.
---
#### Summary
* **Proto-Turkic**: 8 vowels
* **Core pattern**: /i, e, ɯ, a, y, ø, u, o/
* **Harmony**: front/back × rounded/unrounded
* **Modern tweaks**: some languages add schwa (Azer.), drop rounded vowels (Uzbek), or cram in marginal near-high vowels (Kazakh/Kyrgyz)."
[{2025-07-31 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/688b8b2f-a548-8329-9ca4-4be37863dcc3]
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'vowel-phoneme!⇒Tur0VowlPhnm,
* McsEngl.Tur0Phnm.vowel!⇒Tur0VowlPhnm,
* McsEngl.Tur0SpchLago'vowel!⇒Tur0VowlPhnm,
* McsEngl.Tur0VowlPhnm!=vowel-phoneme--of-Tur0Lago,
description::
× generic: consonant-phoneme,
"Here’s a broad overview of the consonant inventories in Proto-Turkic and in several key modern Turkic languages. While exact phoneme sets vary by language (and by dialect), most share a common core inherited from Proto-Turkic.
---
## 1. Proto-Turkic Consonants
Reconstructed inventory (≈ 20 phonemes):
| | Bilabial | Alveolar | Postalveolar | Velar | Uvular | Glottal |
| **Plosive** | *p* *b* | *t* *d* | | *k* *g* | *q* *ɢ* | |
| **Affricate** | | *c* (*t͡s*) | *č* (*t͡ʃ*) | | | |
| | | *j* (*d͡z*) | *ǯ* (*d͡ʒ*) | | | |
| **Fricative** | | *s* *z* | *š* *ž* | *x* *ɣ* | *χ* *ʁ* | *h* |
| **Nasal** | *m* | *n* | | *ŋ* | | |
| **Liquid** | | *l* *r* | | | | |
| **Approx.** | | *y* (*j*) | | | | |
* **Notes:**
* *c*/*j* and *č*/*ǯ* represent sibilant affricates.
* Uvulars (*q, ɢ, χ, ʁ*) preserved in some modern branches but lost or re-interpreted in others.
---
## 2. Selected Modern Turkic Inventories
Below is a high-level summary of how that system shows up (with common extensions or losses) in six major Turkic languages.
| Language | Key Plosives & Affricates | Fricatives | Nasals & Liquids | Other consonants |
| **Turkish** | /p, b, t, d, k, ɡ/
/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ | /f, v, s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, h/ | /m, n, l, r/ | /j/ |
| **Azerbaijani** | /p, b, t, d, k, ɡ, q/
/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ | /f, v, s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, ɣ, h/ | /m, n, ŋ, l, r/ | /j/ |
| **Kazakh** | /p, b, t, d, k, ɡ, q/
/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ | /s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, ɣ, χ/ | /m, n, ŋ, l, r/ | /j, w/ |
| **Kyrgyz** | /p, b, t, d, k, ɡ, q/
/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ | /s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, ɣ, χ/ | /m, n, ŋ, l, r/ | /j, w/ |
| **Uzbek** | /p, b, t, d, k, ɡ, q/ | /s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, ɣ/ | /m, n, ŋ, l, r/ | /j, w/ |
| **Uyghur** | /p, b, t, d, k, ɡ, q/
/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ | /s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, ɣ, χ, h/ | /m, n, ŋ, l, r/ | /j/ |
| **Turkmen** | /p, b, t, d, k, ɡ, q/
/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ | /f, v, s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, ɣ, χ, h/ | /m, n, ŋ, l, r/ | /j/ |
* **Affricates:** /t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ are nearly universal; /t͡s, d͡z/ occur in some dialects or loanwords.
* **Uvulars:** /q, χ, ʁ/ remain phonemic in the “Qipchaq” branch (e.g. Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uzbek, Uyghur, Turkmen); Turkish and Azerbaijani have merged these with velars or dropped them.
* **Fricatives:**
* /f, v/ often restricted to recent loanwords in older or more conservative dialects.
* /h/ is unstable: absent in Kazakh/Kyrgyz, but present in Uyghur and Turkmen.
* **Nasals:** /ŋ/ is contrastive in Qipchaq languages but only allophonic (before \[k, ɡ]) in Turkish.
* **Liquids & Approximants:** /l, r, j/ are universally present; /w/ appears only in a few Qipchaq languages, typically in loanwords.
---
### 3. Phonological Developments & Notes
* **Lenition & Fortition:** In many modern languages, Proto-Turkic *b, d, g* between vowels have weakened (e.g. Turkish “ad” \[ad] vs. modern conversational \[aː]).
* **Palatalization:** Some Khalaj and Karluk varieties show secondary palatalized series (e.g. /kʲ, gʲ/).
* **Loan Consonants:** Persian and Arabic loans introduce /ʔ/, additional fricatives (e.g. /θ, ð/), and pharyngeals (e.g. /ʕ/) which are often nativized (θ → t or s, etc.).
---
**Summary:**
* **Proto-Turkic** had a rich 20-phoneme consonant system, including uvulars and affricates.
* **Modern Turkic languages** share a core set of plosives (/p, b, t, d, k, ɡ/), affricates (/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/), fricatives (/s, z, ʃ, ʒ, x, ɣ/), nasals (/m, n, ŋ/), liquids (/l, r/), and approximant (/j/).
* **Branch-specific features:** Qipchaq languages retain uvulars (/q, χ, ʁ/) and phonemic /ŋ/, while Oghuz languages (Turkish, Azerbaijani, Turkmen) have largely merged or lost these."
[{2025-07-31 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/688b8b2f-a548-8329-9ca4-4be37863dcc3]
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0ConsPhnm!=Turkic-consonant-phoneme,
* McsEngl.Tur0Phnm.vowelNo!⇒Tur0ConsPhnm,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'consonant-phoneme!⇒Tur0ConsPhnm,
* McsEngl.Tur0SpchLago'consonant!⇒Tur0ConsPhnm,
description::
× generic: letter,
"Here’s an overview of the principal writing systems used—both historically and today—by Turkic languages. While the exact repertoires vary from one language to another (and often shift with political change), most Turkic speech‐communities have cycled through a small handful of scripts:
---
## 1. Early/Common Ancestor Scripts
| Script | Period & Region | Key Features |
| **Orkhon (Old Turkic)** | 8th–10th c. CE; Mongolia (“runiform”) | Vertical “runic” letters carved on stone steles; 38 letters. |
| **Uyghur alphabet** | 8th–14th c.; successor to Sogdian | Vertical, cursive; gave rise to Mongolian and Manchu scripts. |
---
## 2. Islamic & Medieval Era
| Script | Period & Region | Notes |
| **Perso-Arabic** | 10th c.–present in many areas | Adapted by adding letters for Turkic vowels/consonants; used by Ottoman Turkish, Chagatai, modern Uyghur, Kazakh (pre-Cyrillic), Azerbaijani (pre-1929), Turkmen (pre-1993), Uzbek (pre-1928). |
| **Chagatai** (Arabic style) | 15th–20th c.; Central Asia | Literary language of Timurid and Mughal courts; rich manuscript tradition. |
---
## 3. 20th Century Reforms & Soviets
| Language | Pre-Reform Script | Post-Reform & Date |
| **Turkish** | Ottoman Turkish (Perso-Arabic) | Latin (1928) |
| **Azerbaijani** | Perso-Arabic | Latin (1929); Cyrillic under USSR (1939); back to Latin (1991) |
| **Uzbek** | Perso-Arabic | Latin (1928); Cyrillic (1940); reverting to Latin (1993, ongoing) |
| **Turkmen** | Perso-Arabic | Latin (1928); Cyrillic (1940); back to Latin (1993) |
| **Kazakh** | Perso-Arabic | Latin (1929 draft, not adopted); Cyrillic (1940); Latin (official transition 2017–2025) |
| **Kyrgyz** | Perso-Arabic (scholarly) | Latin (1928 draft); Cyrillic (1940– ); Latin discussions under way |
| **Crimean Tatar** | Ottoman (Arabic) | Latin (1928); Cyrillic (1938); back to Latin (1991) |
---
## 4. Modern-Day Scripts (2025)
| Language | Script(s) in Active Use |
| **Turkish** | Latin (single standardized alphabet) |
| **Azerbaijani** | Latin |
| **Turkmen** | Latin |
| **Uzbek** | Latin (official), Cyrillic (still in media/older texts) |
| **Kazakh** | Cyrillic (legacy) → **Latin** (official by Jan 1 2025) |
| **Kyrgyz** | Cyrillic (primary); Latin options under discussion |
| **Uyghur** | Perso-Arabic (official); also Latin & Cyrillic for pedagogy/encoding |
| **Crimean Tatar** | Latin (primary); Cyrillic in some publications |
| **Salar, Chuvash, …** | Cyrillic (minority languages of Russia) |
---
### A Few Notes on Adaptation
* **Perso-Arabic → Latin/Cyrillic** reforms almost always involved reducing the number of vowels in orthography to match Turkish/Azerbaijani’s eight-vowel system, plus diacritics (e.g. **ö, ü, ñ**).
* **Soviet-era scripts** sought phonemic transparency but often introduced new letters (e.g. Kazakh’s ‹ә, ғ, қ, ң, ө, ұ›).
* **21st-century Latinization** (e.g. Kazakh’s 2017–2025 plan) emphasizes keyboard-friendliness: digraphs replace diacritics (e.g. ‹sh› for ‹ш›, ‹ng› for ‹ң›).
* **Uyghur Arabic** remains in wide everyday use (home, signage, publishing), but Latin (“Uyghur Pinyin”) and Cyrillic are taught for internationalization and computing.
---
#### In Sum
Most Turkic languages have cycled through:
1. **Orkhon “runiform”** → 2. **Uyghur/Sogdian-derived cursive** → 3. **Perso-Arabic** → 4. **Latin** (interrupted by) **Cyrillic** → 5. **Latin** (today)
The exact timing and details differ by region and political context, but this general trajectory captures the evolution of Turkic writing from the 8th century to the present."
[{2025-07-31 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/688b8b2f-a548-8329-9ca4-4be37863dcc3]
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Letr!=letter-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'letter!⇒Tur0Letr,
* McsEngl.Tur0Unit.letter!⇒Tur0Letr,
* McsEngl.letterTur0!⇒Tur0Letr,
description::
× generic: HmnmUnitSyst,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'unit-system!⇒Tur0UnitSyst,
* McsEngl.Tur0UnitSyst!=unit-system-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.unit-system-of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0UnitSyst,
specific::
* word,
* syllable,
description::
× generic: HmnmWord,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Word!=Tur0Lago-word,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'word!⇒Tur0Word,
* McsEngl.wordTur0!⇒Tur0Word,
description::
* speech-word,
* text-word,
===
* compound-word,
* compoundNo-word,
description::
× generic: syllable-of-lagHmnm,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Sylb!=syllable-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'syllable!⇒Tur0Sylb,
* McsEngl.Tur0UnitSyst.syllable!⇒Tur0Sylb,
* McsEngl.Tur0Word'syllable!⇒Tur0Sylb,
* McsEngl.sylbTur0!⇒Tur0Sylb,
description::
× generic: name,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Name!=decoding-unit--of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'name!⇒Tur0Name,
* McsEngl.decoding-unit--of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0Name,
* McsEngl.nameTur0!⇒Tur0Name,
description::
* argo-name,
* verb-name,
* conjunction-name,
===
* term-Tur0Name,
* termNo-Tur0Name,
===
* Tur0Spch-Tur0Name,
* Tur0Text-Tur0Name,
description::
× generic: HmnmArgo,
× semo-relation: ArgoCnpt,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Argo,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'argo!⇒Tur0Argo,
* McsEngl.Tur0Name.argo!⇒Tur0Argo,
* McsEngl.argoTur0!⇒Tur0Argo,
description::
× generic: member-of-argo,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0ArgoMebr,
* McsEngl.Tur0Argo'member!⇒Tur0ArgoMebr,
description::
× generic: form-of--argo-member,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Argo'form-part,
* McsEngl.Tur0Argo'partA,
description::
× generic: auxiliary-of--argo-member,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Argo'auxiliary-part,
* McsEngl.Tur0Argo'partB,
description::
× generic: HmnmNoun,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Noun,
* McsEngl.Tur0ArgoMebr.noun!⇒Tur0Noun,
* McsEngl.nounTur0!⇒Tur0Noun,
description::
× generic: HmnmAdje,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Adje,
* McsEngl.Tur0ArgoMebr.adjective!⇒Tur0Adje,
* McsEngl.adjeTur0!⇒Tur0Adje,
description::
× generic: HmnmAdve,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Adve,
* McsEngl.Tur0ArgoMebr.adverb!⇒Tur0Adve,
* McsEngl.adveTur0!⇒Tur0Adve,
description::
× generic: HmnmPron,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Argo.pronoun!⇒Tur0Pron,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron!=pronoun-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'pronoun!⇒Tur0Pron,
* McsEngl.pronTur0!⇒Tur0Pron,
description::
· Tur0PronPersonal is a-pronoun that denotes a-person-of-language.
· FIRST-person:
*
· SECOND-person:
*
· THIRD-person:
*
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronPersonal,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.personal!⇒Tur0PronPersonal,
description::
· interrogative:
* who, whom, whose,
· deictic:
* this-human, that, he|she,
* these, those, they,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronHuman,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.human!⇒Tur0PronHuman,
description::
· interrogative:
* what,
· deictic:
* this-entity, that, it,
* these, those, they,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronHumanNo,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.humanNo!⇒Tur0PronHumanNo,
description::
· interrogative:
* where,
· deictic:
* here;there,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronSpace,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.space!⇒Tur0PronSpace,
description::
· interrogative:
* when,
· deictic:
* now, then,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronTime,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.time!⇒Tur0PronTime,
description::
· interrogative:
* how-many;how-much,
· deictic:
* so-much,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronQuantity,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.quantity!⇒Tur0PronQuantity,
description::
· interrogative:
* how,
· deictic:
* so;thus,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronManner,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.manner!⇒Tur0PronManner,
description::
· interrogative:
* why,
· deictic:
* therefore, that's why, for this reason,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0PronCause,
* McsEngl.Tur0Pron.cause!⇒Tur0PronCause,
description::
× generic: verb,
× semo-relation: VerbCnpt,
name::
* McsEngl.Turkic-verb!⇒Tur0Verb,
* McsEngl.Tur0Verb,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'verb!⇒Tur0Verb,
* McsEngl.Tur0Name.verb!⇒Tur0Verb,
* McsEngl.verbTur0!⇒Tur0Verb,
description::
× generic: member-of-verb.
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0VerbMebr,
* McsEngl.Tur0Verb'member!⇒Tur0VerbMebr,
description::
× generic: form-part--of--verb-member.
description::
× generic: auxiliary-part--of--verb-member:
description::
* Chinese-Verb,
* English-Verb,
* Esperanto-Verb,
* Greek-Verb,
* GreekAncient-Verb,
* Turkish-Verb,
description::
* process-verb:
** action-verb,
** function-verb,
* relation-verb,
description::
× generic: conjunction,
name::
* McsEngl.Turkic-conjunction!⇒Tur0Conj,
* McsEngl.Tur0Conj!=conjunction-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Name.conjunction!⇒Tur0Conj,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'conjunction!⇒Tur0Conj,
* McsEngl.conjTur0!⇒Tur0Conj,
description::
× generic: argo-phrase,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Phrase,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'argo-system,
description::
× generic: verb-argument,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0VerbArgu!=Tur0Lago--verb-argument,
* McsEngl.VerbArgu.Tur0!⇒Tur0VerbArgu,
* McsEngl.Tur0LogoView'verb-argument!⇒Tur0VerbArgu,
description::
× generic: sentence,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Sent!=sentence-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'sentence!⇒Tur0Sent,
* McsEngl.sentTur0!⇒Tur0Sent,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Sent'word-order,
* McsEngl.word-order--of-Tur0Sent,
description::
× generic: titless-sentence-system,
·
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'sentence-system.titleNo,
* McsEngl.systSentTitlNo-of-Tur0Lago,
description::
× generic: section-of-lagoHmnm,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Sect!=section-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'section!⇒Tur0Sect,
* McsEngl.sectTur0!⇒Tur0Sect,
description::
× generic: root-node--of-lagoHmnm,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'root!⇒Tur0Root,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'root!⇒Tur0Root,
* McsEngl.rootTur0!⇒Tur0Root,
description::
· speech of Tur0Lago is the-output of Tur0SpchLago.
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'speech!⇒Tur0Spch,
* McsEngl.speech-of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0Spch,
* McsEngl.spchTur0!⇒Tur0Spch,
description::
· text of Tur0Lago is the-output of Tur0TextLago.
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'text!⇒Tur0Text,
* McsEngl.logo-text--of-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0Text,
* McsEngl.textTur0!⇒Tur0Text,
description::
"Here’s a structured evaluation of the Turkic language family, across key dimensions of genetic unity, internal diversity, typology, reconstruction, and areal contact:
---
## 1. Genetic Unity
* **Clear Common Ancestry:** All Turkic varieties share a suite of regular sound correspondences (e.g. \*Proto-Turkic \*/*k/* > /k/ vs. *č/* > /ç/ in Common vs. Oghuric) and identical agglutinative morphology (case-marking, agreement, derivation).
* **Reconstruction Success:** Scholars have confidently reconstructed several hundred Proto-Turkic roots and a full system of phonemes and affixes, demonstrating a robust genetic signal.
* **Diagnostic Innovations:** Innovations such as the velar spirantization in Oghuric (*k/* > /r/ or /l/) and the loss of initial *ʔ/* in Common Turkic further cement subgroupings.
**Verdict:** Strong evidence for a single family with two primary branches (Common vs. Oghuric), underpinned by systematic phonological and morphological correspondences.
---
## 2. Internal Classification & Diversity
* **Oghuric vs. Common Turkic:** Oghuric (e.g. Chuvash) split early and exhibits unique reflexes (e.g. *č/* > /l/).
* **Common Turkic Subgroups:**
* **Oghuz:** Turkish, Azerbaijani, Turkmen
* **Kipchak:** Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Tatar
* **Karluk:** Uzbek, Uyghur
* **Siberian Turkic:** Yakut, Dolgan
* **Salar/Jaḏīġ:** Peripheral, with distinct substrate influences
* **Mutual Intelligibility:** Varies widely—speakers of neighboring subgroups (e.g. Kazakh–Kyrgyz) often understand each other, but Oghuric (Chuvash) is unintelligible to Common Turkic speakers.
**Verdict:** A moderately deep family tree: first split c. 1 – 2 millennia BC, with later radiations adapting to local contacts and migrations.
---
## 3. Typological Cohesion
* **Agglutination & Affixation:** Virtually every Turkic language builds words by linear suffix chains—one meaning per morpheme.
* **Vowel Harmony:** Nearly all maintain back/front and rounding harmony, dictating affix shapes.
* **Head-Final Syntax:** Uniform SOV order, postpositions, modifier-head order.
* **Exception:** Some Western languages (e.g. Balkan Turkish) show partial loss of harmony or SOV order under heavy contact.
**Verdict:** High typological consistency, marking Turkic as one of the best-defined agglutinative families.
---
## 4. Reconstruction Robustness
* **Data Base:** Old Turkic inscriptions (Orkhon, Yenisei), Persian/Arabic transcriptions, early loans into Chinese and Iranian.
* **Comparative Method:** Employed successfully to recover a six-vowel harmonic system, a full consonant inventory, paradigm shapes, and core lexicon (> 300 roots).
* **Chronology:** Reasonably anchored by loan chronology (Middle Chinese loans date to ca. 1st m BC–4th c AD) and Old Turkic texts (7th–10th c AD).
**Verdict:** One of the more securely reconstructed proto-languages for a non-Indo-European family.
---
## 5. Areal & Contact Influences
* **Iranian & Tocharian Loans:** Reflect early agricultural, metallurgical borrowing.
* **Mongolic & Tungusic:** Centuries of steppe bilingualism yield shared areal features (e.g. SOV, vowel harmony reinforcement).
* **Slavic & Persian:** Later contacts (e.g. Kipchak with Russian; Ottoman with Persian) show heavy lexical layering.
* **Result:** Some features (like agglutination) may be reinforced areally, but core correspondences remain genetic.
**Verdict:** Contact has layered vocabulary and minor typological shifts, but has not obscured the family’s genetic profile.
---
## 6. Controversies & Macro-Family Claims
* **Altaic Hypothesis:** Once posited a Proto-Altaic ancestor uniting Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic (±Korean, Japanese).
* **Supporters** cite parallels in sound correspondences and grammar.
* **Critics** argue these are results of prolonged contact, not shared descent.
* **Current Consensus:** Most specialists reject Altaic as genetic; Turkic stands alone.
**Verdict:** Turkic is best regarded as an independent family, with any deeper “Altaic” links remaining unproven.
---
## 7. Sociolinguistic & Geographic Scope
* **Modern Spread:** From Eastern Europe (Turkey, Azerbaijan) across Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan) into Siberia (Yakutia) and Northwest China (Xinjiang).
* **Speakers:** \~200 million native speakers; dozens of official and recognized minority languages.
* **Standardization:** Multiple standard varieties (e.g. Istanbul Turkish, Kazakh in Cyrillic/Latin, Uyghur in Arabic script).
**Verdict:** A major world family with wide geographic dispersal, significant geopolitical importance, and varying degrees of modernization.
---
## Overall Assessment
The Turkic language family is a **genetically coherent**, **typologically uniform**, and **well-reconstructed** group, with clear internal subgroupings and robust comparative data. Its only real controversy lies in debated macro-family ties (Altaic), but as a standalone family it remains one of the best-understood non-Indo-European lineages, richly illustrating the interplay of steppe nomadism, language contact, and agglutinative grammar."
[{2025-07-31 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/688b070e-0138-832e-9259-fe4c534ae5de]
description::
"**Origins and Proto-Turkic**
* Around the 1st millennium BCE, speakers of what we call **Proto-Turkic** lived in a region roughly spanning parts of modern-day Mongolia and southern Siberia.
* Linguistic reconstruction suggests a common ancestor with certain shared sound correspondences (e.g. initial \*b/\*p, vowel harmony, agglutinative morphology).
**Old Turkic (6th–13th centuries CE)**
* The earliest written attestations appear in the Orkhon inscriptions (8th century), found in Mongolia, recording the language of the Göktürks.
* Other Old Turkic texts include the Yenisei inscriptions and the Codex Cumanicus at the western edge of the Turkic world.
* Characterized by a set of case suffixes (e.g. *-da* for locative), and a stable vowel harmony system.
**Middle Turkic (13th–16th centuries CE)**
Divided into Eastern and Western branches, reflecting political fragmentation and migrations:
| Branch | Regions & Texts | Key Developments |
| **Chagatai** | Central Asia (Timurid courts) | Standard literary language for the region. |
| **Kipchak** | Golden Horde, later Crimean khanate | Founded the basis for modern Crimean and Tatar. |
| **Uyghur** | Turfan and Turko-Mongol states in Xinjiang region | Transition toward Modern Uyghur; loss of vowel harmony in some dialects. |
**Modern Turkic (17th century–present)**
Evolved into several distinct branches. A simplified family tree:
```
Proto-Turkic
│
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
│ │
Oghuz branch Kipchak branch
│ │
┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐
│ │ │ │
Turkish Azerbaijani Kazakh Tatar
│
Turkmen
```
* **Oghuz languages** (e.g. Turkish, Azerbaijani, Turkmen) spread westward into Anatolia and the Caucasus.
* **Kipchak languages** (e.g. Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Tatar) dominate the Eurasian steppe.
* **Karluk branch** (e.g. Uyghur, Uzbek) centers on Central Asia.
* **Siberian branch** (e.g. Yakut, Dolgan) in northeastern Siberia.
**Key Features and Innovations**
* **Vowel harmony** remains pervasive, though weakened in some modern languages (e.g. Uyghur).
* **Agglutinative morphology**: root + chains of suffixes indicating case, number, person, etc.
* **Lexical layers**: native Turkic vocabulary overlaid with Persian, Arabic (through Islam), and Russian borrowings (in the north).
**Historical Spread and Influence**
* **6th–10th centuries CE**: Turkic polities (Göktürks, Uyghurs) facilitate east–west migrations.
* **11th century**: The Seljuk Turks bring an Oghuz dialect into Anatolia, laying groundwork for Ottoman Turkish.
* **16th–19th centuries**: Russian imperial expansion introduces Slavic loanwords into Siberian and Kipchak languages; Persian-Arabic loanwords peak in Ottoman Turkish and Chagatai.
* **20th century reforms**:
* Turkey’s language reform (1928) replaces Arabic script with Latin, purges many Persian/Arabic words.
* Soviet language policies create distinct literary standards (e.g. separate Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uzbek orthographies and norms).
**Contemporary Developments**
* **Revival and standardization** efforts across Turkic states emphasize mutual intelligibility (e.g. in the “Turkic World”).
* **Digital era**: Unicode and digital media encourage minority and Siberian Turkic languages to gain online presence.
---
This overview traces Turkic from its Proto-Turkic roots through its classical inscriptions, medieval literary heights, to the vibrant modern languages spoken by over 200 million people today."
[{2025-07-31 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/688b27c7-aa80-8323-ae83-8d89d6f9b6d4]
name::
* McsEngl.evoluting-of-Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'evoluting,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'parent-child-tree,
child-tree::
* Turkic
* Common Turkic
* Oghuz
* Western Oghuz
* Turkish
=== Early forms:
* Old Anatolian Turkish
* Ottoman Turkish
=== Standard forms:
* Istanbul Turkish
=== Dialects:
* Cypriot Turkish
* Iraqi Turkmen
* Karamanli Turkish
* Meskhetian Turkish
* Rumelian Turkish
* Syrian Turkish
* Tur0Lago'child-tree,
description::
× Mcsh-creation: {2025-07-31},
"Here’s a concise overview of Proto-Turkic, the reconstructed ancestor of all Turkic languages:
---
**1. Chronology & Homeland**
* **Timeframe:** Spoken roughly between the late 1st millennium BC and early 1st millennium AD (often c. 500 BC–100 AD).
* **Urheimat:** Eastern Central Asian steppe—likely regions of modern Mongolia and northwest China—before westward dispersals.
**2. Sources & Reconstruction**
* **Primary Data:**
* Old Turkic inscriptions (Orkhon, Yenisei, Talas, 7th–10th c. AD)
* Early loanwords in neighboring languages (Middle Chinese, Sogdian, Iranian dialects)
* **Comparative Method:**
* Systematic correspondence sets across Common Turkic (e.g. Turkish, Uzbek, Kazakh) and Oghuric (e.g. Chuvash) branches.
* Internal reconstruction using preserved archaic features.
**3. Phonology**
* **Vowel Inventory:** Six-vowel system with ±rounding and ±back distinctions, and advanced harmonic classes:
| Front Unrounded | Front Rounded | Back Unrounded | Back Rounded |
| \*i \* | y \* | ɯ \* | u \* |
| e \* | ø \* | – | o \* |
*Vowels marked “*” participated in the prototypical i- or u-type harmony.\*
* **Consonants:** A set of stops (/p, t, k, q/), affricates (/ts, tʃ/), fricatives (/s, ʃ, x, ɣ/), nasals (/m, n, ŋ/), liquids (/l, r/), and glides (/j, w/).
* **Vowel Harmony:** Primary system of front vs. back and rounding harmony, conditioning affix allomorphy.
**4. Morphology**
* **Agglutinative:** Strings of one-to-one morphemes building words.
* **Nominal:**
* Cases: Nominative (unmarked), genitive (*-nɨŋ*), dative (*-ga*), accusative (*-nɨ*), locative (*-da*), ablative (*-dan*).
* Plural: *-lAr* (with harmony).
* Possessive suffixes: Person-number marking following the case forms.
* **Verbal:**
* Tense-aspect-mood marked by suffixes: e.g. past (*-dɨ*), present (*-ɣAr*), potential (*-Al*), optative (*-Ai*).
* Person-number agreement via suffixes.
**5. Syntax & Word Order**
* Predominantly **SOV** (Subject-Object-Verb).
* Postpositional; modifiers precede head nouns.
**6. Lexicon & Semantics**
* Core vocabulary includes pastoral and steppe-nomadic terms (e.g. *köl* “lake,” *qïz* “girl,” *bar* “to go”), reflecting early nomadic lifeways.
* Ancient agricultural and metal-working terms appear as loans from Iranian and Tocharian neighbors.
**7. Internal Classification**
```
Proto-Turkic
├─ Oghuric (e.g. Proto-Chuvash)
└─ Common Turkic
├─ Siberian Turkic (e.g. Yakut, Dolgan)
├─ Karluk (e.g. Uzbek, Uyghur)
├─ Kipchak (e.g. Kazakh, Kyrgyz)
├─ Oghuz (e.g. Turkish, Azerbaijani)
└─ Bulghar/Chuvash subgroup
```
**8. Sample Reconstructions**
| Gloss | Proto-Turkic |
| “water” | *su* |
| “head” | *baŋ* |
| “tooth” | *dɨs* |
| “wind” | *yel* |
**9. Significance**
Understanding Proto-Turkic illuminates the development of vowel harmony, agglutination, and nomadic cultural vocabulary. Its reconstruction also underpins comparative studies with Mongolic and Tungusic (the contentious “Altaic” hypothesis), though most specialists today treat Turkic as a standalone family.
---
This sketch captures the core features of Proto-Turkic phonology, morphology, lexicon, and historical context. Let me know if you’d like deeper dives—e.g., detailed sound-change laws, specific affix paradigms, or comparisons with Old Turkic inscriptions!"
[{2025-07-31 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/688b070e-0138-832e-9259-fe4c534ae5de]
name::
* McsEngl.ProtoTurkic!⇒PttkLago,
* McsEngl.PttkLago!=ProtoTurkic,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'ProtoTurkic!⇒PttkLago,
* McsEngl.Tur1Lago!⇒PttkLago,
description::
× Mcsh-creation: {2025-10-17},
"Of course. The verb in Proto-Turkic was a complex and highly agglutinative part of speech, with a rich system of tense, mood, voice, and person.
Here is a breakdown of the Proto-Turkic verb system.
### 1. Basic Structure
A typical Proto-Turkic verb could be broken down into a specific order of morphemes (word parts):
**Verb Stem + (Voice) + (Negation) + Tense/Aspect/Mood + (Personal Ending)**
Not all elements were always present, but this was the standard order.
### 2. Verb Stem
This is the core of the verb, conveying the basic meaning.
* **\*yẹ-** "to eat"
* **\*bar-** "to go"
* **\*öl-** "to die"
* **\*seb-** "to love, like"
### 3. Voice (Diathesis)
Voice suffixes were added directly to the stem to change the relationship between the subject and the action.
* **Causative:** **\*-(X)t-** or **\*-(X)r-**
* **\*öl-** ("to die") + **\*-(i)t-** → **\*öl-it-** ("to kill")
* **\*yẹ-** ("to eat") + **\*-(i)t-** → **\*yẹ-t-** ("to feed")
* **Passive/Reflexive:** **\*-(X)l-**
* **\*yụ-** ("to wash") + **\*-(u)l-** → **\*yụ-l-** ("to be washed")
* **\*sev-** ("to love") + **\*-(i)l-** → **\*sev-il-** ("to be loved")
* **Reciprocal/Cooperative:** **\*-(X)š-**
* **\*kọṛ-** ("to see") + **\*-(u)š-** → **\*kọṛ-uš-** ("to see each other, to meet")
* **\*söylẹ-** ("to speak") + **\*-(i)š-** → **\*söylẹ-š-** ("to converse")
Multiple voice suffixes could be combined, e.g., **\*öl-üt-ül-** ("to be caused to die," i.e., "to be executed").
### 4. Negation
The primary negative suffix was **\*-mA-**, which was inserted before the tense/mood marker.
* **\*bar-** ("to go") → **\*bar-ma-** ("to not go")
* **\*yẹ-** ("to eat") → **\*yẹ-me-** ("to not eat")
### 5. Tense, Aspect, and Mood (TAM)
This is the most complex part, defining the time and nature of the action.
#### A. Finite Forms (Could form a full sentence)
**Past Tenses:**
* **\*-dX- (Simple/Definite Past):** For witnessed, completed actions.
* **\*bar-dï-m** ("I went")
* **\*-mXš (Evidential/Narrative Past):** For actions not directly witnessed, hearsay, or inferred.
* **\*bar-mïš** ("He apparently went / It is said that he went")
**Present/Future Tenses:**
* **\*-r (Aorist/Indefinite):** For habitual actions, general truths, or future intent.
* **\*bar-ur-men** ("I go / I will go")
* **\*-y (Present Progressive):** For actions happening right now. It was originally a verb **\*er-** ("to be") that was suffixed.
* **\*bar-a-yïn** (< **\*bar-a + er-men**) ("I am going")
**Optative (Desire/Volition):**
* **\*-gAy:** Expresses a wish or intention.
* **\*bar-ɣay-men** ("I want to go / May I go")
**Imperative:**
* The bare stem was the imperative for the 2nd person singular.
* **\*bar!** ("Go!")
* Other persons had specific suffixes like **\*-(X)l** (2nd pl.) and **\*-(X)yXn** (1st pl.).
#### B. Non-Finite Forms (Verbal Nouns, Participles, Converbs)
These forms created subordinate clauses or were used as nouns/adjectives.
**Participles (Relative Clauses):**
* **\*-dXk (Past Participle):** "The one who did X"
* **\*bar-dïk** ("the one who went")
* **\*-mXš (Narrative Participle):** "The one who (apparently) did X"
* **\*bar-mïš** ("the one who went (it is said)")
* **\*-r (Aorist Participle):** "The one who does/will do X"
* **\*bar-ur** ("the one who goes")
**Verbal Nouns (Infinitive):**
* **\*-mA-k:** The dictionary form or abstract action of the verb.
* **\*bar-ma-k** ("the act of going")
**Converbs (Adverbial Clauses):**
* **\*-p (Converb):** "and then..." or "by doing..."
* **\*bar-ïp** ("and (he) went...")
* **\*-A (Converb):** "while..." or "upon..."
* **\*bar-a** ("while going...")
### 6. Personal Endings
These marked the subject of the verb. There were two main sets: one for **predicative** forms (like the aorist in **\*-r**) and one for **possessive/oblique** forms (like the past tense in **\*-dX**).
| Person | Predicative (e.g., Aorist) | Possessive (e.g., Past Tense) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **1st Sing.** | **\*-mXn** | **\*-m** |
| **2nd Sing.** | **\*-sXn** | **\*-ŋ** |
| **3rd Sing.** | **— (zero)** | **— (zero)** |
| **1st Pl.** | **\*-mXz** | **\*-k** |
| **2nd Pl.** | **\*-sXz** | **\*-ŋVz** |
| **3rd Pl.** | **\*-lAr** | **\*-lAr** |
**Examples:**
* **Aorist:** **\*bar-ur-men** ("I go")
* **Definite Past:** **\*bar-dï-m** ("I went")
### Summary Example: "To be fed"
Let's build a complex form: "They were not fed."
1. **Stem:** **\*yẹ-** ("to eat")
2. **Causative Voice:** **\*yẹ-t-** ("to feed")
3. **Passive Voice:** **\*yẹ-t-il-** ("to be fed")
4. **Negation:** **\*yẹ-t-il-me-** ("to not be fed")
5. **Past Tense:** **\*yẹ-t-il-me-dï-** ("was not fed")
6. **3rd Person Plural:** **\*yẹ-t-il-me-dï-lAr** ("They were not fed.")
This intricate structure is the foundation from which all Turkic languages, from Turkish and Azerbaijani to Uzbek and Yakut, developed their own verb systems."
[{2025-10-17 retrieved} https://chat.deepseek.com/a/chat/s/b882e486-797f-452f-b2de-c00f71b96c4e]
description::
× Mcsh-creation: {2025-07-31},
"The Oghuz languages are a branch of the Turkic language family, which is a large group of languages spoken across a vast region from Eastern Europe to Siberia and Western China. The Oghuz branch is particularly significant as it includes several major languages spoken by millions of people. Here is an overview of the Oghuz languages:
### Major Oghuz Languages:
1. **Turkish**:
- **Regions**: Turkey, Cyprus, and significant immigrant communities in Europe and the Middle East.
- **Speakers**: Over 80 million.
- **Features**: Turkish has a rich literary tradition and is written in the Latin script.
2. **Azerbaijani**:
- **Regions**: Azerbaijan and parts of Iran (South Azerbaijani).
- **Speakers**: Around 30 million.
- **Features**: Azerbaijani has two main dialects (North and South Azerbaijani) and uses both Latin and Cyrillic scripts in different regions.
3. **Turkmen**:
- **Regions**: Turkmenistan and neighboring regions.
- **Speakers**: About 6 million.
- **Features**: Turkmen is written in the Latin script, and it has a strong influence from Persian due to historical interactions.
### Lesser-Known Oghuz Languages:
1. **Gagauz**:
- **Regions**: Moldova (Gagauzia), Ukraine, and some parts of Bulgaria and Romania.
- **Speakers**: Around 150,000.
- **Features**: Gagauz is written in the Latin script and has many similarities with Turkish.
2. **Crimean Tatar**:
- **Regions**: Crimea (Ukraine), and diaspora communities in Turkey and Romania.
- **Speakers**: Around 500,000.
- **Features**: Crimean Tatar has three main dialects (Northern, Central, and Southern), and it uses both Latin and Cyrillic scripts.
3. **Khorasani Turkish**:
- **Regions**: Northeastern Iran.
- **Speakers**: Approximately 400,000.
- **Features**: Khorasani Turkish has a strong Persian influence and is typically written in the Persian script.
### Characteristics of Oghuz Languages:
- **Phonology**: Oghuz languages share common phonological features, such as vowel harmony and agglutination, which are typical of Turkic languages.
- **Grammar**: They use postpositions rather than prepositions, have a subject-object-verb (SOV) word order, and extensive use of suffixes to indicate grammatical relationships and nuances.
- **Vocabulary**: While they have a shared Turkic base, each language has absorbed loanwords from neighboring languages and cultures, such as Arabic, Persian, Russian, and European languages.
- **Writing Systems**: The languages have historically used various scripts, including Arabic, Cyrillic, and Latin. Today, the trend is towards the Latin script, especially for languages like Turkish and Turkmen.
### Historical and Cultural Context:
The Oghuz languages have a rich history connected to the Oghuz Turks, a historical group of nomadic tribes who played a significant role in the history of Central Asia and the Middle East. The spread of these languages is tied to the movements and conquests of Oghuz Turks, such as the Seljuks and the Ottomans, who established vast empires in the medieval period.
### Modern Relevance:
Today, Oghuz languages are not only important in terms of their number of speakers but also in their cultural and political influence. Turkish, for instance, is a major language of international diplomacy, media, and commerce. Azerbaijani is crucial for energy politics in the Caspian region, and Turkmen plays a vital role in the cultural identity of Turkmenistan.
Understanding the Oghuz languages provides insight into the linguistic diversity and cultural richness of the Turkic-speaking world, highlighting the interconnectedness of these languages and their speakers."
[{2024-06-24 retrieved} https://chatgpt.com/c/644fea7e-f8d7-4ee2-9884-218d97729111]
name::
* McsEngl.Oghuz-languages;;Tur0Lago,
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago;Oghuz-languages,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago'generic-specific-tree,
generic-tree::
* human-mind-language,
* language,
* mapping-method,
* method,
* info,
* model,
* entity,
specific-tree::
* speech-Tur0Lago,
* text-Tur0Lago,
===
description::
× generic: SpchLago,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago.speech!⇒Tur0SpchLago,
* McsEngl.Tur0SpchLago,
* McsEngl.speech-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0SpchLago,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0SpchLago'relation-to-Tur0TextLago,
* McsEngl.speech-to-text-relation-of-Tur0Lago,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0Lago.text!⇒Tur0TextLago,
* McsEngl.Tur0TextLago,
* McsEngl.text-Tur0Lago!⇒Tur0TextLago,
name::
* McsEngl.Tur0TextLago'relation-to-Tur0SpchLago,
* McsEngl.text-to-speech-relation-of-Tur0Lago,
this webpage was-visited times since {2025-07-31}
page-wholepath: synagonism.net / worldviewSngo / dirLag / Tur0Lago
SEARCH::
· this page uses 'locator-names', names that when you find them, you find the-LOCATION of the-concept they denote.
⊛ GLOBAL-SEARCH:
· clicking on the-green-BAR of a-page you have access to the-global--locator-names of my-site.
· use the-prefix 'Tur0Lago' for structured-concepts related to current concept 'Turkic-language'.
⊛ LOCAL-SEARCH:
· TYPE CTRL+F "McsLag4.words-of-concept's-name", to go to the-LOCATION of the-concept.
· a-preview of the-description of a-global-name makes reading fast.
webpage-versions::
• version.last.dynamic: McsLag000041.last.html,
• version.1-0-0.2025-07-31: (0-30) ../../dirMiwMcs/dirLag/McsLag000041.1-0-0.2025-07-31.html,
• version.0-1-0.2025-07-31 draft creation,